tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2352189175211648260.post7924284313266838829..comments2023-10-24T14:45:41.342+02:00Comments on K’s Law: T 1265/10 – What They Really Wantorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07992102028406713066noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2352189175211648260.post-29498961390449372632012-11-27T21:56:09.053+01:002012-11-27T21:56:09.053+01:00Agreed.Agreed.oliverhttp://k-slaw.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2352189175211648260.post-66556343119103673002012-11-24T23:13:02.676+01:002012-11-24T23:13:02.676+01:00I find it difficult to interpret this cross on For...I find it difficult to interpret this cross on Form 2300 as an authorisation to withdraw money from a deposit account. Or rather, it seems completely clear to me that the cross is certainly not such an authorisation, and that it would be incorrect if the EPO withdrew money from that account based only on the cross (and as George noted, the EPO did not interpret it as an authorisation).Myshkinnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2352189175211648260.post-51508734904902491742012-11-22T15:50:33.858+01:002012-11-22T15:50:33.858+01:00A case of "the cheque is in the mail, honest&...A case of "the <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=the%20check%20is%20in%20the%20mail" rel="nofollow">cheque</a> is in the mail, honest"!Roufousse T. Fairflynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2352189175211648260.post-70257644166680150342012-11-22T11:04:41.928+01:002012-11-22T11:04:41.928+01:00The proof of the pudding is in the eating. Why did...The proof of the pudding is in the eating. Why did the EPO then not draw the payment on the account in the first place? "With a communication dated 15 April 2005, the opponent was informed that the opposition fee had not been paid." If the intention had been clear, this would have been a superfluous communication. And for deposit account holders, the need for form 1010 seems superfluous as long as the proper field in form 2300 is crossed.<br /><br />Kind regards,<br /><br /><br />George Brock-NannestadAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com