tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2352189175211648260.post4641438050493795127..comments2023-10-24T14:45:41.342+02:00Comments on K’s Law: T 549/08 – Impossible Combinationorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07992102028406713066noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2352189175211648260.post-91888077201088299902010-04-23T02:09:06.700+02:002010-04-23T02:09:06.700+02:00One might also argue that a claim that is (technic...One might also argue that a claim that is (technically) contradictory has an empty scope, so that the requirement that the skilled person can make substantially all embodiments falling within its scope is automatically complied with.<br /><br />Unless Art. 83 requires that the skilled person can make at least one embodiment. Probably not an unreasonable requirement, also given R. 42(1)(e).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com