tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2352189175211648260.post2882976503728600280..comments2023-10-24T14:45:41.342+02:00Comments on K’s Law: T 1194/08 – Stick To What You Saidorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07992102028406713066noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2352189175211648260.post-84840636576916215022011-10-26T22:57:11.163+02:002011-10-26T22:57:11.163+02:00This approach is firm but fair, I personally have ...This approach is firm but fair, I personally have no problems with it whatsoever.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2352189175211648260.post-30584139791790054762011-10-26T08:10:47.632+02:002011-10-26T08:10:47.632+02:00There is (at least) an older one when this what is...There is (at least) an older one when this what is mentioned in the orbiter dictum actually happened. T 917/95.<br />The Board found the claims of the 2nd auxiliary request to be allowable but the description was no adapted to them:<br />"...the patent proprietor could not rely on the board's postponing of its ruling simply to permit amendment of the description... even if the claims are patentable..."Manolisnoreply@blogger.com