tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2352189175211648260.post2802690375581674119..comments2023-10-24T14:45:41.342+02:00Comments on K’s Law: T 1389/10 – Suitable Fororhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07992102028406713066noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2352189175211648260.post-81579857552535939412011-10-20T22:57:34.084+02:002011-10-20T22:57:34.084+02:00Certainly not if D7 and D8 are prior art (as here)...Certainly not if D7 and D8 are prior art (as here).<br /><br />But even if we assume they are not, I do not think that the French courts would find a toe protector to infringe the above claim. However, I have to say that I have no concrete case to offer. I’ll have a look in my case law folder.oliverhttp://k-slaw.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2352189175211648260.post-35190885503256229542011-10-20T21:38:35.151+02:002011-10-20T21:38:35.151+02:00Would a French court on the other hand consider t...Would a French court on the other hand consider that the devices of D7 or D8 infringe the patent?pat-agoni-ahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14383461539323071512noreply@blogger.com