tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2352189175211648260.post2697016594680448383..comments2023-10-24T14:45:41.342+02:00Comments on K’s Law: T 1547/09 – Game Overorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07992102028406713066noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2352189175211648260.post-48781675335338008302010-10-13T16:23:59.736+02:002010-10-13T16:23:59.736+02:00A similar, but more entertaining case, was T 717/0...A similar, but more entertaining case, was <a href="http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/pdf/t040717eu1.pdf" rel="nofollow">T 717/04</a>.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2352189175211648260.post-55578350217411052702010-10-12T11:24:06.548+02:002010-10-12T11:24:06.548+02:00It has to be said that this another well reasoned ...It has to be said that this another well reasoned decision focusing on the implementation rather than the subject mater. Shame this line of reasoning isn't more closely followed across the EPOAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com