tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2352189175211648260.post2151230018168672363..comments2023-10-24T14:45:41.342+02:00Comments on K’s Law: D 9/09 – More Trouble With Marksorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07992102028406713066noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2352189175211648260.post-26645331883772493342013-05-08T23:50:28.762+02:002013-05-08T23:50:28.762+02:00@ Roufousse T. Fairfly
As a member of an Examinati...@ Roufousse T. Fairfly<br />As a member of an Examination Committee I am bound to secrecy, but I can assure you that a copy that is to be awarded 49 marks receives a hell of a lot of attention. We really check very, very carefully that there is no way to cross the 50-mark-line. If there is any such way, the candidate will be pushed over the line. So if in the end anybody is awarded 49 (or 44) marks, it is because there was no way to go beyond.Anonymnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2352189175211648260.post-71831131446281436772013-05-08T11:26:40.133+02:002013-05-08T11:26:40.133+02:00Well yes, but that would be compensible wouldn'...Well yes, but that would be compensible wouldn't it? Or was it only after 2009 that you could carry that across years?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2352189175211648260.post-3506088448729830522013-05-08T04:26:14.403+02:002013-05-08T04:26:14.403+02:00The hapless candidate had to wait two years for th...The hapless candidate had to wait two years for that decision, which was handed down shortly after the deadline for registering to sit the 2012 EQE had passed. I hope s/he reapplied immediately to the 2010 EQE, it would have been much more effective.<br /><br />Granted, to flunk paper A by one measly little point must have been humiliating. Dante's warning should be engraved above the door to the EQE secretariat, if it isn't already...Roufousse T. Fairflynoreply@blogger.com